![]() The film has been remade several times and even has foreign adaptations.Towards the end of the film, Juror #3 becomes this for the other side, after all the other jurors have decided there's enough doubt that they can't justify a guilty verdict. This leads to a bit of Values Dissonance between laypeople and legal professionals watching the same film/play. Conducting your own investigation and bringing a weapon into the jury room are both serious juror misconduct. note Interestingly, while #8 is trying to get everyone else to do their job properly, he is not. However, because there was reasonable doubt, a verdict of "not guilty" is appropriate. It leaves the question of the suspect's guilt or innocence ambiguous in the end. He just wants to make sure they've done their job properly, as the accused is facing a mandatory death sentence. Worth noting that, unlike some other examples, the rogue juror isn't convinced of the suspect's innocence either. However, as the jury is forced to analyze the evidence in detail, they slowly discover that almost all of it is flawed in some way. A rogue juror (#8) is the sole holdout on a case which appears to indicate that the accused is definitely a murderer. Making matters problematic is the holdout juror is Mary Jane Watson-Parker. A Spider-Man story from the late '80s involved a jury deliberating over the fate of an accused criminal apprehended by Spider-Man. ![]() ![]() Needless to say, the case does not go smoothly. One of the City of Heroes comics (the Blue King run, not the Top Cow run) throws superpowers into this mix, with Apex appointed to the superpowered jury, when a superhero stands accused of second-degree murder and naturally, he has to face a jury of his peers.The Batman (Tom King) storyline "Cold Days" has Bruce, questioning himself in the wake of his aborted wedding, arrange to be on the jury for Mr Freeze's trial, where he's the only juror asking hard questions about Batman's involvement, and asking if being a supervillain is necessarily evidence that Freeze is guilty of this particular crime.Contained an amusing moment where Bruce, honestly answering a jury selection question about whether he was fit to sit on the jury, confessed that he was prejudiced about the case because he was actually Batman and after everyone stopped laughing, the judge told him to stop jerking around and take things seriously. As the rest of the jury were taken in by the defendant's innocent act, he had to convince them that the defendant was actually guilty. Batman Adventures once had Bruce Wayne selected to sit on the jury of a man whom he, as Batman, had arrested trying to kidnap a wealthy couple's baby.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |